If you're having a particular problem with these packages not working well together, post a minimal working example. In any case, there's no reason at all to use natbib if all you want are hyperlinked citations: just add the hyperref package. Even stranger, when I start to write the cite command in TeXmaker, th trng. I export citations into a bib file but no matter what I do, the LaTeX document says that there were undefined citations. I have the Better Bib (La)Tex add-on for zotero. ![]() Or perhaps they had in mind some conflict between natbib and the cite package, which is different than the \cite command. I am trying to import citations to natbib and call them using the citep command in LaTeX. Perhaps what they had in mind what that natbib provides some extra commands like \citet and \citep, etc., for more fine grained control over citations, and in general, when using natbib, it is better to use one of those than \cite. Natbib on its own does not provide hyperlinked citations: it does no only in conjunction with hyperref. As with anything, you should read their documentation, but in general, the two work well together. It is also completely false that natbib conflicts with hyperref. ![]() Hyperref has no problem creating hyperlinks for citations using the \cite command. And natbib sometimes conflicts with hyperref package). You should try natbib package instead (sic - you should use cite or natbib, not two of them. Nasser wrote:hyperref cannot make a hyperlink from \cite reference.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |